Eleven defendants charged with aggravated driving under the influence had their blood tested by the Scottsdale Crime Laboratory.
State v. Bernstein Arizona Supreme Court, April 23, 2015 [...]
Plaintiff suffered serious injuries while performing clean-up duties during the final stages of construction at a Sam’s Club store located on property owned by Wal-Mart.
Lee v. M&H and Wal-Mart Arizona Court of Appeals, [...]
Plaintiff’s Sues Medicis for Consumer Fraud, Product Liability, and Punitive Damages
Watts v. Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation Arizona Court of Appeals, [...]
Rudolfo Brothers Plastering, Inc. claimed that Everest Indemnity Insurance Company acted in bad faith by entering into a settlement agreement that exhausted the liability coverage of an Owner Controlled Insurance Program (OCIP) policy to Rudolfo’s detriment.
Everest Indemnity Insurance Company v. Rea Arizona Court of [...]
A tortfeasor’s insurance company does not satisfy a properly perfected medical lien simply by including the medical provider as a joint payee on a settlement check.
Midtown Medical Group, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance Group Arizona [...]
The Arizona Supreme Court today issued a decision addressing whether a warrant authorizing the search of a home allowed police to search a purse belonging to a person not named in the warrant.
State of Arizona v. Gilstrap Supreme Court of the [...]
An Appraiser Owes No Duty of Care to a Seller if the Appraiser Does Not Intend the Seller to Receive and Rely Upon the Appraisal
Southwest Non-Profit Housing Corp. v. Novak Arizona Ct. Appeals, [...]
A Public Entity Waives a Notice of Claim Defense by Failing to Seek Prompt Judicial Resolution; a Plaintiff May Demonstrate Breach of the Standard of Care by Showing a Defendant Has Departed from Rules of Its Own Making
Ponce v. Parker Fire Dist. Arizona Ct. Appeals, Div. [...]
Store that Acquires Easement for Arrival and Departure of Invitees Owes Duty of Care to Invitee Who Is Injured While Using Easement for the Same Purpose
Timmons v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc. Arizona Ct. [...]
Public Entities Are Statutorily Immune from Liability for Felonies Committed by Public Employees Unless the Entity Had Actual Knowledge of the Employee’s Propensity for the Crime
Tucson Unified Sch. Dist. v. Borek Arizona Ct. Appeals, [...]