Claim Accrual For Notice Of Claim Purposes Does Not Await Expert Opinion On Fault
Thompson v. Pima County Ct. Appeals, Div. Two, November [...]
Federal Statute Does Not Toll Limitations Period On State Claim Where Federal Case Is Dismissed For Lack Of Jurisdiction
Morris v. Giovan Ct. Appeals, Div. One, November 12, [...]
Jury Is Appropriate Fact Finder For Question Of Fact On Notice Of Claim Compliance
Lee v. State Ct. Appeals, Div. One, November 9, [...]
Division Two Addresses Accrual, Equitable Estoppel For Notice Of Claim Purposes
Little v. State of Arizona Ct. Appeals, Div. Two, [...]
To Be Protected By Qualified Immunity, Officers Are Not Required To Examine Arrestee’s Evidence That Warrant Was Quashed
Ochser v. Funk Ct. Appeals, Div. One, September 28, [...]
Mandatory “Real Property” Venue Provision Does Not Apply To Cases Alleging Personal Injury Arising From The Use Of Real Property
Nielson v. Hicks Ct. Appeals, Div. One, September 21, [...]
“Excusable Neglect” Does Not Justify Rule 60(C) Relief From A Judgement Based On The Statute Of Limitations
Porter v. Spader Ct. Appeals, Div. One, September 21, 2010Authored [...]
Estate Cannot Recover “Inherent Value Of Decedent’s Life” Under APSA
Estate of Mary Winn v. Plaza Healthcare, Inc. Ct. Appeals, [...]
Default Notice Sent To Apartment Complex With No Apartment Number Does Not Satisfy Notice Requirement
Sandra Ruiz v. Marisela Lopez Ct. Appeals, Div. One, [...]
Contract Between General Employer And Special Employer Does Not Conclusively Establish Control Over Borrowed Employee
Tarron v. Bowen Machine & Fabricating, Inc. Ariz. Supreme [...]