Court Upholds Constitutionality Of A.R.S. §12-2603 Requiring Affidavit Medical Malpractice Cases
Jilly v. Rayes Ct. Appeals, Div. One, April 30, 2009 [...]
Court May Consider Real Estate Agent’s Improper Conduct In Deciding Whether Principal Is Entitled To Specific Performance Of Real Estate Contract
Queiroz v. Harvey Arizona Supreme Court, April 28, 2009Authored by [...]
Plaintiff Need Not Exhaust Administrative Remedies For Claim That Arizona DHS Facility Violated Her Civil Rights
Bailey-Null v. Valueoptions; Meta Services, Inc. Ct. Appeals, Div. [...]
Insurer Defending Under Reservation Of Rights Loses Its Subrogation Rights If It Received Notice And The Insured’s Settlement Was Reasonable
Monterey Homes v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company Ct. Appeals, [...]
Consumer Expectation Test Applies In A Product Defect Case
Brethauer v. General Motors Corporation Ct. Appeals, Div. One, March [...]
Court Upholds Constitutionality Of Statute Providing Qualified Immunity To Public Entity Or Employee Causing Injury To Driver Where Driver Was Under The Influence
Devries v. State of Arizona, et. al Ct. Appeals, Div. [...]
The Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Apply To A Case Against A Design Professional
Flagstaff Affordable Housing Limited Partnership v. Design Alliance Inc. [...]
Evidentiary Errors Cause reversal Of Medical Malpractice Defense Verdict
Pipher v. Loo Ct. Appeals, Div. One, March 10, [...]
Attorney Does Not Have A Charging Lien On Client’s Recovery Where Recovery Fund Is Eliminated By Rule 68 Sanctions
Monterey Homes v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company Ct. Appeals, [...]
Non-Party At Fault Notice Requires Facts Explaining Why Non-Party Is Liable; Rule 68 Sanctions Include Non-Testifying Expert Fees
Scottsdale Ins. Co. v. Cendejas Ct. Appeals, Div. One, [...]