Court Rejects The “Employee’s Own Conveyance Rule” As An Exception To The “Going And Coming Rule” In Tort Cases”
Carnes v. Phoenix Newspapers, Inc. Ct. Appeals, Div. One, [...]
The Family Purpose Doctrine Is Still Valid In Arizona
Young v. Beck Ariz. Supreme Court, April 5, 2011 [...]
Jay Rosenthal and Barry Uhrman Defense Win Featured in DRI’s The Voice
Jay Rosenthal and Barry Uhrman, attorneys with Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, P.L.C., had their recent defense win featured in the March 23 issue of The Voice, DRI’s weekly eNewsletter. To read the full article, please click here.
Plaintiff Need Not Show That Failure To Name A Real Party In Interest Was Due To Mistake
Preston v. Kindred Hospitals West, L.L.C. Arizona Supreme Court, March [...]
AHCCCS Is Limited In Its Lien Recovery From a Tort Plaintiff Who Settles For Less Than The Value Of His Case
Southwest Fiduciary, Inc. v. AHCCCS Ct. Appeals, Div. One, [...]
A.R.S. § 12-2604, The Medical Expert Requirement Statute Is Not Unconstitutional
Governale v. Lieberman Ct. Appeals, Div. One, March 10, [...]
Participants In Brawl Can Be Held Jointly And Severally Liable
Chappell v. Wenholz Ct. Appeals, Div. One, February 8, [...]
No Personal Jurisdiction Over Missouri Resident Whose Spouse Has Arizona Business Dealings
Sigmund v. Rea Ct. Appeals, Div. One, February 1, [...]
Notice Of Claim That Fails To Correctly Identify Owner Of Subject Real Property Does Not Satisfy Claim Statute
Turner v. City of Flagstaff Ct. Appeals, Div. One, [...]
Arizona Court May Exercise Personal Jurisdiction Over Non-Resident Defendants Who Possess Purposeful, Minimum Contacts With State
The Planning Group of Scottsdale v. Lake Mathews Mineral Properties, [...]