Court May Consider Real Estate Agent’s Improper Conduct In Deciding Whether Principal Is Entitled To Specific Performance Of Real Estate ContractNarinda Greene2018-09-05T10:04:52-07:00April 28, 2009|
Plaintiff Need Not Exhaust Administrative Remedies For Claim That Arizona DHS Facility Violated Her Civil RightsNarinda Greene2018-09-05T09:46:03-07:00April 7, 2009|
Insurer Defending Under Reservation Of Rights Loses Its Subrogation Rights If It Received Notice And The Insured’s Settlement Was ReasonableNarinda Greene2018-08-28T08:08:56-07:00April 1, 2009|
Consumer Expectation Test Applies In A Product Defect CaseNarinda Greene2018-09-05T09:44:49-07:00March 31, 2009|
Court Upholds Constitutionality Of Statute Providing Qualified Immunity To Public Entity Or Employee Causing Injury To Driver Where Driver Was Under The InfluenceNarinda Greene2018-09-05T09:43:02-07:00March 31, 2009|
The Economic Loss Doctrine Does Not Apply To A Case Against A Design ProfessionalNarinda Greene2018-08-28T08:20:29-07:00March 24, 2009|
Evidentiary Errors Cause reversal Of Medical Malpractice Defense VerdictNarinda Greene2018-08-28T08:22:37-07:00March 10, 2009|
Attorney Does Not Have A Charging Lien On Client’s Recovery Where Recovery Fund Is Eliminated By Rule 68 SanctionsNarinda Greene2018-08-28T08:14:50-07:00March 9, 2009|
Non-Party At Fault Notice Requires Facts Explaining Why Non-Party Is Liable; Rule 68 Sanctions Include Non-Testifying Expert FeesNarinda Greene2018-08-28T08:18:16-07:00March 3, 2009|
Punitive Damages Eight Times Compensatory Ruled Excessive And Reduced To A 1:1 RatioNarinda Greene2018-08-23T10:37:10-07:00January 13, 2009|