Jones, Skelton & Hochuli Welcomes Five Summer Associates to Phoenix Office
Jones, Skelton & Hochuli is pleased to welcome Jaron Chavez, Hee Jae Lee, Shae Nagy, Haley Norling, and Brayden Ruvo to to our 2025 Summer Associate Program. During their summer clerkship at […]
JSH’s Insurance Practice Receives Repeat Chambers USA “Band 1” Ranking
Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, PLC […]
Arizona Law Does Not Require an Insurer to Provide Underinsured Motorist Coverage for an ATV Accident on Private Property
State Farm v. Orlando
Arizona Supreme Court
May 29, 2025
JSH Attorney: Eileen GilBride
Arizona’s Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Act (the “UIM Act”) requires insurers selling motor vehicle liability policies […]
Arizona Supreme Court Upholds Enforceability of Contingent Morris Agreement, And Holds Car Insurance Policy Does Provide Coverage For Employee Operating A Non-Owned Auto, If The Vehicle Is Being Used Directly In Or In Furtherance Of The Employer’s Business.
Cravens v. Montano
Arizona Supreme Court
April 29, 2025
JSH Attorney: Elizabeth Garcia & Justin Ackerman
In Cravens v. […]
Southwest Super Lawyers Honors 23 JSH Attorneys
Jones, Skelton & Hochuli is pleased to announce that 10 of the firm’s lawyers have been selected to the 2025 edition of Southwest Super Lawyers, and 13 have been recognized on […]
Spurlock and Combrink Obtain Defense Verdict in Chihuahua, et al. v. Goodman
Jones, Skelton & Hochuli, PLC is pleased to announce that partner Erica Spurlock and associate Michael Combrink obtained a defense verdict in Chihuahua, et al. […]
AZ Supreme Court Clarifies the Standard for Judicial Immunity and A.R.S. § 11-449
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies the Standard For Judicial Immunity And A.R.S. § 11-449
Garibay v. Johnson
Arizona Supreme Court
March 13, 2025
JSH Attorney: Ashley Caballero-Daltrey
The […]
Perez v. Circle K: Reversed and Remanded
Arizona Supreme Court Clarifies That the Existence of Unreasonably Dangerous Condition Is a Breach Question
Westerman v. Ernst
Court of Appeals Holds Reasonable Customers Could Conclude Gravel Flower Bed Is Permissible Means of Egress and Known Drop from Pavement May Not Be Obvious